A fresh twist has emerged in Prince Harry’s ongoing legal fight with the British press, after decade-old messages showing a flirtatious exchange with a journalist were presented in court. The disclosure has reignited scrutiny over the Duke of Sussex’s relationship with the media.
The messages came to light during closing arguments in a High Court trial against a major tabloid publisher and are now being reviewed as part of a broader privacy lawsuit.
Playful Exchanges Surface in Court
According to a report by The Daily Mail, the messages between Prince Harry and journalist Charlotte Griffiths were sent between late 2011 and early 2012. They reportedly contained lighthearted and informal language, including references like “movie snuggles” and casual banter.
The pair are said to have met at a gathering hosted by film producer Arthur Landon and later connected on Facebook. Their conversations included jokes, personal remarks, and invitations, reflecting a friendly rapport.
The resurfacing of these exchanges has added complexity to the case, especially given Harry’s earlier claims that he kept his distance from journalists.
Timeline of Personal Relationships
At the time of the messages, Prince Harry had recently ended his long-term relationship with Chelsy Davy in 2011. His subsequent romance with Cressida Bonas began in 2012, as reported by Page Six. Years later, he met Meghan Markle in 2016, and the couple married in 2018.
Although the messages predate his marriage, their appearance in court has sparked debate about the nature of his past interactions with media professionals.
The lawsuit was filed in 2022 by Prince Harry, along with several high-profile figures including Elton John and David Furnish, against Associated Newspapers Limited. The plaintiffs accuse the publisher of engaging in unlawful activities between 1993 and 2011, including phone hacking, surveillance, and “blagging” (obtaining information through deception). The publisher denies all allegations, stating that its journalists relied on legitimate sources, including people within the prince’s own social circle.
Contradictions Under Court Scrutiny
During earlier testimony, Prince Harry insisted he was not friends with journalists and claimed he cut ties upon learning of Griffiths’ profession. However, the recently presented messages suggest a more informal and friendly dynamic, which legal observers believe could challenge certain aspects of his testimony.
Griffiths, now an editor-at-large, has stated that she and the prince moved in similar social circles at the time and were introduced through mutual friends.
Trial Concludes, Verdict Pending
The nearly 11-week trial wrapped up its arguments on March 31. Presiding judge Matthew Nicklin noted that a verdict would be delivered after a short break, though he cautioned that the ruling might take time. The outcome is expected to have significant implications for media ethics and privacy rights across the United Kingdom.
Ongoing Battle with the Press
This lawsuit is part of Prince Harry’s broader campaign against segments of the British media. In recent years, he has launched multiple legal actions alleging invasions of his privacy. In 2025, he reached a settlement with a Murdoch-linked media group, which included an apology and an acknowledgment of unlawful practices by tabloid investigators.
Harry has consistently stated that his legal efforts aim to ensure accountability and prevent future misconduct.
About the Author
